Search found 5 matches
- Wed May 22, 2024 1:41 pm
- Forum: Software
- Topic: NAL-NL2 wrapper, compression threshold
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14581
Re: NAL-NL2 wrapper, compression threshold
Hi Tobias, thank you for the reply, meanwhile I have also noticed the 52 dB as default value in the NAL-NL2 clinical program. With this parameter and appropriate settings, we were able to exactly reproduce the output of the clinical program with the wrapper, so I would agree that the output is valid...
- Tue May 14, 2024 9:16 am
- Forum: Software
- Topic: NAL-NL2 wrapper, compression threshold
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14581
NAL-NL2 wrapper, compression threshold
Hi, I am currently working on obtaining NAL-NL2 insertion gain targets using the nalnl2wrapper. First, it is great tool to have! One input argument I was wondering about is the wide band compression threshold (wbct). If I understand the documentation of the original dll correctly, this value is usua...
- Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:20 pm
- Forum: Software
- Topic: Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
- Replies: 5
- Views: 25165
Re: Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
Thank you for pointing me towards the separate softclipper plugin, this is indeed a good idea. I agree that in general, clipping should be avoided as much as possible. In the specific application, we need a simple switch between maximum output levels in lab settings and public events, but after read...
- Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:17 am
- Forum: Software
- Topic: Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
- Replies: 5
- Views: 25165
Re: Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
Hi Nick, thank you for running these tests. Maybe more towards the openMHA developers, I think that this behavior is not what is most practical for many applications, and maybe there should be an option to change the order of filtering and softclipping if desired. Let me explain with an example. Say...
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 9:26 am
- Forum: Software
- Topic: Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
- Replies: 5
- Views: 25165
Filtering and softclip in transducers plugin
Hi,
something I have been wondering about the transducers plugin: What is the order in which FIR filtering and softclip are executed? I did not find anything about this in the documentation and not sure whether I read the c++ file corretly that filtering is done prior to clipping.
something I have been wondering about the transducers plugin: What is the order in which FIR filtering and softclip are executed? I did not find anything about this in the documentation and not sure whether I read the c++ file corretly that filtering is done prior to clipping.